Friday, July 30, 2010

Politicians have a pulse?

Don't believe me? Take a look: http://www.breitbart.tv/rep-anthony-weiner-loses-it-on-house-floor/

Then take a look at people's comments to it.
americans overwhelmingly oppose the health care bill. yet this communist wants to jam it through. i'd like to tell him where to jam it. socialist pig.

at least weiner is named right


OK, once and for all, let us define what Socialism and Communism are.

From Wiki
Socialism is an economic and political theory based on public or common ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources.[1][2][3]

In a socialist economic system, production is carried out by a public association of producers to directly produce use-values (instead of exchange-values), through coordinated planning of investment decisions, distribution of surplus, and the use of the means of production. Socialism is a set of social and economic arrangements based on a post-monetary system of calculation, such as labour time, energy units or calculation-in-kind.[4]

Socialists advocate a method of compensation based on individual merit or the amount of labour one contributes to society.[5] They generally share the view that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and derives its wealth through a system of exploitation.


Now that we have defined Socialism, let me clarify something else....there has never been a socialist nation based on the definition as outlined above. Got it? Russia, NK, Cuba.....either dictatorships, or party system power...but certainly not Socialists. Defamation and slurring of the definition by capitalistic propaganda - to illicit an emotional response rather than an intellectual one - has been the bread and butter for polarizing government subjects. We being their subjects of course - the top 1% of our nations wealth. They could give a rats ass about us other then to force us into two propaganda confession boxes - Democrat or Republican. That's how "they" control our vote - the tiny little illusion of freedom they dangle for us, and they do this through politicized propaganda.

Communism

Pure communism" in the Marxian sense refers to a classless, stateless society, one where decisions on what to produce and what policies to pursue are made in the best interests of the collective society with the interests of every member of society given equal weight in the practical decision-making process in both the political and economic spheres of life.


And once again there has NEVER been a "true" communist state...not even close. The ones politicized as such - Cuba, NK, China, Khmer, etc are/or were all authoritarian. The last thing the top 1% of the worlds wealth want is for people to adopt Communism, much less Socialism, for they would have no legitimate claim to the extreme wealth and power they hold. So what do these people do? They educate people that Communism is evil, and that nations that pursue it will be attacked or cutoff from trade, yet if you closely look at the targets of their propaganda - NONE were ever following the parameters of Communism or Socialism. That would take an intellectual initiative from people, and most people react on emotion....like our good politician that started this outburst.

So every time I hear someone say Obama is a Socialist pig, or a Communist, it's a face palm moment for me.

Obama is an ivy league politician who comes to the bar of the top 1% to get his marching orders. All his good friends make up the top corporate world CEO's, the top banking giants, and the elite financial mega powers - ECB, IMF, and the FEDS. His ear is to their lead. It's not to the little people - the subjects of fascist corporatism. The party system - they control both - is their method to play us. A Machiavellian take: Get party A and party B to fight among themselves, and party A and party B will never know what party C (the bankers and to big to fail corporations)are doing.

Just wanted you to understand all these matrix codes. So what was Weiner all hot about? This bill would cost a little over 7 billion, and it would take care of the 9/11 responders, the ill consequences of ground zero. Government spending, you betcha, but the politicians had no problem passing 60 billion more dollars to an already exceeded trillion dollar budget to kill people half way around the world who had nothing to do with anything other than growing some wonderful opium, herding goats, and praying to their god. The whole link to terrorism and 9/11 is just more propaganda. You won't see any of these politicians, bankers, or corporate heads taking up a rifle, and patrolling some IED infested roadside...they have our youth to do that. No...you'll just see them bitch and moan about spending anything on the "little" people.

No comments:

Post a Comment